Difference between revisions of "Talk:Trinity (Session 2)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Talk:Pentinity moved to Talk:Trinity (Session 2)) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The hat is original to the duck. We needed a duck to do the talent show act, "but the hat really was sort of winning", says Grant Gould, holder and purchaser of the duck (also my husband which is why I can ask him that sort of thing). He further notes that the hat was probably sewn on by a minimum-wage worker in Asia, so who knows how much sorrow its disappearance would engender in that person (the rest of us, of course, would be bummed). --[[User:Ayelton|Andromeda]] 12:49, 11 August 2007 (PDT) | The hat is original to the duck. We needed a duck to do the talent show act, "but the hat really was sort of winning", says Grant Gould, holder and purchaser of the duck (also my husband which is why I can ask him that sort of thing). He further notes that the hat was probably sewn on by a minimum-wage worker in Asia, so who knows how much sorrow its disappearance would engender in that person (the rest of us, of course, would be bummed). --[[User:Ayelton|Andromeda]] 12:49, 11 August 2007 (PDT) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Latest revision as of 20:49, 21 June 2009
Just in case it's unclear from the '07 speech -- and because apparently there were questions about this --
The hat is original to the duck. We needed a duck to do the talent show act, "but the hat really was sort of winning", says Grant Gould, holder and purchaser of the duck (also my husband which is why I can ask him that sort of thing). He further notes that the hat was probably sewn on by a minimum-wage worker in Asia, so who knows how much sorrow its disappearance would engender in that person (the rest of us, of course, would be bummed). --Andromeda 12:49, 11 August 2007 (PDT)