Difference between revisions of "Talk:Silent Football"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
A jihad is a religious war. Hence, if we liken the Universe to a religion, a holy war is perfectly acceptable. The term jihad does not have to refer to the way it has been used recently. | A jihad is a religious war. Hence, if we liken the Universe to a religion, a holy war is perfectly acceptable. The term jihad does not have to refer to the way it has been used recently. | ||
| + | |||
| + | First, how does one liken the Universe to a religion? | ||
| + | Even if one does, that doesn't make a "war" acceptable. Jihads often have a violent tone, which isn't really necessary. I can see the need for some sort of way of asking permission to respond to a hallucination (though one could just plain ask) if the hallucination does something over the line, such as pouring soda on one's head. But that doesn't mean one can turn around and beat the kid up. | ||
Revision as of 23:54, 16 September 2007
Max Wang feels that shrugging a shrotum or shrotumming a shrug is like dividing 42 by 0.
Am I the only one slightly offended by Jihading in Silent football?
No, you're not. Jihading is not at all within the spirit of Silent Football, but some find it funny.
A jihad is a religious war. Hence, if we liken the Universe to a religion, a holy war is perfectly acceptable. The term jihad does not have to refer to the way it has been used recently.
First, how does one liken the Universe to a religion? Even if one does, that doesn't make a "war" acceptable. Jihads often have a violent tone, which isn't really necessary. I can see the need for some sort of way of asking permission to respond to a hallucination (though one could just plain ask) if the hallucination does something over the line, such as pouring soda on one's head. But that doesn't mean one can turn around and beat the kid up.
