Difference between revisions of "Talk:Silent Football"
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Actually Jihad means struggle not war and there are two type the inner jihad and the world jihad. Also Adam said it there is never reason to Jihad if someone is touching you or bugging you tooo much you are allowed to interact with them. The Jihad is silly and potentially dangerous | Actually Jihad means struggle not war and there are two type the inner jihad and the world jihad. Also Adam said it there is never reason to Jihad if someone is touching you or bugging you tooo much you are allowed to interact with them. The Jihad is silly and potentially dangerous | ||
| + | |||
| + | As long as it's not too violent, a jihad is a good way to stop people from interfering with the game, although I do agree with Adam and the others here that very violent jihads are a really, really bad idea. The threat of licking would also work. | ||
Revision as of 16:50, 17 September 2007
Max Wang feels that shrugging a shrotum or shrotumming a shrug is like dividing 42 by 0.
Am I the only one slightly offended by Jihading in Silent football?
No, you're not. Jihading is not at all within the spirit of Silent Football, but some find it funny.
A jihad is a religious war. Hence, if we liken the Universe to a religion, a holy war is perfectly acceptable. The term jihad does not have to refer to the way it has been used recently.
First, how does one liken the Universe to a religion? Even if one does, that doesn't make a "war" acceptable. Jihads often have a violent tone, which isn't really necessary. I can see the need for some sort of way of asking permission to respond to a hallucination (though one could just plain ask) if the hallucination does something over the line, such as pouring soda on one's head. But that doesn't mean one can turn around and beat the kid up.
Actually Jihad means struggle not war and there are two type the inner jihad and the world jihad. Also Adam said it there is never reason to Jihad if someone is touching you or bugging you tooo much you are allowed to interact with them. The Jihad is silly and potentially dangerous
As long as it's not too violent, a jihad is a good way to stop people from interfering with the game, although I do agree with Adam and the others here that very violent jihads are a really, really bad idea. The threat of licking would also work.
