Difference between revisions of "Philosophy of Mind"
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Making fun of each successive philosopher will be worth it. | Making fun of each successive philosopher will be worth it. | ||
− | Also, be wary of Evil Genius. He sneaks up on you and BAM! forces you to change your debate strategy 3 minutes and 21 seconds before the actual debate. | + | Also, be wary of Evil Genius. He sneaks up on you and BAM! forces you to change your debate strategy 3 minutes and 21 seconds before the actual debate. |
+ | Activities can include a trip to the primate lab (completely humane, and lots of fun), a debate with another logic/mind class, a combined lesson/discussion on animal intellegence with the cog psych class, and/or a demo/discussion of the artifical intellegence of Aibo, the cute robot dog. | ||
== Fun Facts == | == Fun Facts == |
Revision as of 14:10, 5 August 2006
Course Description
The Philosophy of Mind course does not require previous experience with logic, but it probably should. A new idea is revered as philosophical gold each morning, holding strong under the weak arguments of the dazed class... only to be challenged by a foe of equal textual length and dryness during study hall, and dashed to pieces by the next morn. But never fear! A new theory shall rise from the ashes of its predecessor like a phoenix of mental overstimulation! Repeat ad infinitum.
Take the class anyway, though. Making fun of each successive philosopher will be worth it.
Also, be wary of Evil Genius. He sneaks up on you and BAM! forces you to change your debate strategy 3 minutes and 21 seconds before the actual debate.
Activities can include a trip to the primate lab (completely humane, and lots of fun), a debate with another logic/mind class, a combined lesson/discussion on animal intellegence with the cog psych class, and/or a demo/discussion of the artifical intellegence of Aibo, the cute robot dog.
Fun Facts
Philosophy of Mind A at Carlisle, Session 2, 2005 consisted of wonderfully spiffy people. They were Alex, George, Freak -I mean Daniel, Eva, Sarah, Caitlin, Erika, and Mel(eroni)/Olivia. In that order of seating. If you don't believe me, you can look at the picture in the memory book.
Alas, their hypothetical pet rat was killed by professor Zsolt when he hit it one too many times, hypothetically. The students of Zsolt all agreed to damn Descartes to a Godless world (hahahaha) and see how he survived not knowing what to think. The poor rat had no chance against skeptical physicalists.
At Lancaster, MIND is known for having really excellent people every year. With the recent change in instructors, however, 04.1 and 05.1 were unfortunately boring classes, despite the inclusion of other wonderfully spiffy people. The 05.1 class were the originators of Thormanism, a religion that is now quite widespread in Papua New Guinea. The 05.2 session students (also known for being excellent as well as traditonalists--but i repeat myself--every year) determined that pants were indeed chairs, inducing much confusion and many a CTYI joke the rest of the session. There are usually 2 sections (A for the younger students, B for the older), and the teachers change rather often.
I would not recommend taking philosophy of mind unless you can take it session one at Loudonville in 2005 and have Dan Thero as a teacher and the most amazing class possible.