Difference between revisions of "Great Cases: American Legal History"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Infobox | ||
| + | | title = Great Cases: American Legal History | ||
| + | | header1 = Humanities Course | ||
| + | | label2 = Course Code | data2 = [[Great Cases: American Legal History|CASE]] | ||
| + | | label3 = Year Opened | data3 = 1999 | ||
| + | | label4 = Sites Offered | data4 = [[BRI]], [[EST]] | ||
| + | | label5 = Previously Offered | data5 = [[ASU]], [[BTH]], [[CHS]], [[FRD]], [[SCZ]] | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{ | ||
{{CAA courses}} | {{CAA courses}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Course Description== | ==Course Description== | ||
Revision as of 15:48, 3 April 2018
| Humanities Course | |
|---|---|
| Course Code | CASE |
| Year Opened | 1999 |
| Sites Offered | BRI, EST |
| Previously Offered | ASU, BTH, CHS, FRD, SCZ |
{{
Course Description
From the CTY Summer Catalog:
Students in this history course trace this evolution by examining famous cases in their historical, political, and social contexts. For example, Marbury v. Madison is explored within the framework of the early Federalist period; Dred Scott v. Sanford in the context of rising political fragmentation and sectional debate; Lochner v. New York as the legal aspect of the social and political movement known as Progressivism; Brown v. Board of Education in relation to the dynamic civil rights movement; and Hamdi v. Rumsfeld as representative of the tensions in America in the post-9/11 era.
Through debates, simulations, group projects, and individual research, students develop close-reading and persuasive-writing skills. Moreover, they learn to critique decisions about fundamental issues that have confronted the American legal system from the time of the ratification of the Constitution to today.
