Difference between revisions of "Talk:Canon"
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
I think in 03 or 04 some RA or someone made a CD and sold em ~[[User:Yulia|Yulia]] | I think in 03 or 04 some RA or someone made a CD and sold em ~[[User:Yulia|Yulia]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | It was '04, I believe. I'm not sure if they were given out or sold (I think sold). It didn't have Tunak (which was added '05). --[[User:Memoriesonfilm|Max W.]] 16:10, 3 September 2006 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 18:10, 3 September 2006
well, this is not the whole shebang, you forgot about John's Hopkins
JHU forgot itself. Baltimore site doesn't even have its own page.
Lancaster Lower Canon
At least when I was at CTY back in the day, Sweet Transvestite was required on Second Saturday but it was not considered Canon; nor was it on the Canon CD. Should this be somehow placed in a category of its own? --Sammka 18:38, 21 August 2006 (MST)
I think that, technically, Sweet Transvestite is added to the Lower Canon only on Second Saturday, and then immediately taken off. I assume this is because there is no other way to explain the phenomenon that it is always played on Second Saturday; hence, it is sometimes Lower Canon.
Also, making a whole new category would be kinda confusing. I'd say jes leave it as it is, with the short disclaimer. --JW
theres a canon CD? -- concerned squirrel
I think in 03 or 04 some RA or someone made a CD and sold em ~Yulia
It was '04, I believe. I'm not sure if they were given out or sold (I think sold). It didn't have Tunak (which was added '05). --Max W. 16:10, 3 September 2006 (MST)
