Difference between revisions of "Talk:Courses"
(2010) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
b) Yes as well.<br> | b) Yes as well.<br> | ||
--[[User:Memoriesonfilm|Max W.]] 13:59, 5 September 2006 (MST) | --[[User:Memoriesonfilm|Max W.]] 13:59, 5 September 2006 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == 2010 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Uh-oh. I don't think this article is synchronized with the template/box, and I don't think either are fully up-to-date. For example, the 2010 course list no longer offers the Asian-Pacific Rim (while both the article and the template say it is offered), Dissent is listed as defunct in the article (and it is not offered in 2010) but as not defunct in the template (and the same goes for Twentieth Century Art), and such. I'm currently too busy to check everything; does anyone else want to do it? >_> | ||
| + | --[[User:Lietk12|Lietk12]] 15:54, 27 December 2009 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 18:54, 27 December 2009
two things: a) Can we consider a course defunct if it doesn't appear in the current CTY catalog? and if it doesn't appear there, how do we know it even existed in the first place? b) Should we make a seperate category for CAA courses? --JW
a) Yes, and we'll have to assume that they did exist.
b) Yes as well.
--Max W. 13:59, 5 September 2006 (MST)
2010
Uh-oh. I don't think this article is synchronized with the template/box, and I don't think either are fully up-to-date. For example, the 2010 course list no longer offers the Asian-Pacific Rim (while both the article and the template say it is offered), Dissent is listed as defunct in the article (and it is not offered in 2010) but as not defunct in the template (and the same goes for Twentieth Century Art), and such. I'm currently too busy to check everything; does anyone else want to do it? >_> --Lietk12 15:54, 27 December 2009 (PST)
