Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hall of Fame:LOS"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I definitely agree. Actually, it could probably be pretty easily merged into the HoF, which already has a lot of entries about Canon-botching. Actually, if as one of your first mini-project, you could take all of those entries and merge them into a /single/ entry about the repeated screwing-up of Canon, that would be wonderful. The Forever Young thing should fit. If you do this, you should also revise the hofboxes (they're the things referenced in the double-braces). The format for the hofboxes should be pretty self-explanatory; since the Canon botching happens both sessions, just make it 2007-2010 or whatever, and make sure there's only one. Also, the entries should be ordered by the earliest date in question (e.g., something spanning from 2007-2010 should be ordered chronologically for "2007"). THANKS --[[User:Memoriesonfilm|Max W.]] 22:37, 23 August 2010 (PDT) | I definitely agree. Actually, it could probably be pretty easily merged into the HoF, which already has a lot of entries about Canon-botching. Actually, if as one of your first mini-project, you could take all of those entries and merge them into a /single/ entry about the repeated screwing-up of Canon, that would be wonderful. The Forever Young thing should fit. If you do this, you should also revise the hofboxes (they're the things referenced in the double-braces). The format for the hofboxes should be pretty self-explanatory; since the Canon botching happens both sessions, just make it 2007-2010 or whatever, and make sure there's only one. Also, the entries should be ordered by the earliest date in question (e.g., something spanning from 2007-2010 should be ordered chronologically for "2007"). THANKS --[[User:Memoriesonfilm|Max W.]] 22:37, 23 August 2010 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also, when you delete things, be careful that there is only one space left between entries, or the page looks sad. | ||
Latest revision as of 00:40, 24 August 2010
What was on here that got deleted?
I have no clue... why is it that we have no Hall of Fame? This is so embarrassing. Anyone remember anything?
Our hall of fame is pathetic. :P
I feel like the bubbly fountain part could stay if there was more info, as I'm pretty sure i've heard stories about other things being dumped in the fountain in other years. but it's only second session, so perhaps someone with more knowledge should look at that? ~E_t
One of the things about the Hall of Fame is that, especially only threeish years after the fact, if it's in the Hall of Fame, people should still remember it. I recommend deleting the fountain entry entirely -- the entry itself admits that most people probably didn't notice, and if people have things to say, then they can always say it... but better. (Update: I nixxed the fountain the Rickroll entries; tell me if you agree.) --Max W. 22:26, 23 August 2010 (PDT)
i think those were good deletions, but i just seem to remember that there were more memorable stories of things being dumped in fountains. but again, as far as i know it never happened first session, so i don't know anything about it, and what was there really wasn't interesting. also, if the forever young thing really HoF? it seems better suited to HoS or even not significant because canon tends to get screwed up a lot at LOS.
I definitely agree. Actually, it could probably be pretty easily merged into the HoF, which already has a lot of entries about Canon-botching. Actually, if as one of your first mini-project, you could take all of those entries and merge them into a /single/ entry about the repeated screwing-up of Canon, that would be wonderful. The Forever Young thing should fit. If you do this, you should also revise the hofboxes (they're the things referenced in the double-braces). The format for the hofboxes should be pretty self-explanatory; since the Canon botching happens both sessions, just make it 2007-2010 or whatever, and make sure there's only one. Also, the entries should be ordered by the earliest date in question (e.g., something spanning from 2007-2010 should be ordered chronologically for "2007"). THANKS --Max W. 22:37, 23 August 2010 (PDT)
Also, when you delete things, be careful that there is only one space left between entries, or the page looks sad.
