Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fruitopia bottle"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Even if it isn't as old as it's claimed to be, the Fruitopia is (allegedly) nasty enough to warrant its own mythology, no? --JW | Even if it isn't as old as it's claimed to be, the Fruitopia is (allegedly) nasty enough to warrant its own mythology, no? --JW | ||
| + | |||
| + | Oh, it's definitely nasty enough. Just that there's no reason to exaggerate when it's already gross enough. -Dutchman | ||
Revision as of 17:13, 22 August 2006
I would like to know how this bottle predates me. It seems quite improbable that the bottle was around during any passionfruit I attended. Being the emperor 01.1, I happened to have a bottle I asked for and took and saved from 00.1. However, after sipping from it, I dumped it out because it was Quite Nasty (maybe someone else had a taste, but I'm pretty sure we didn't drink it all). More importantly, I'm pretty sure that this bottle did not last nine years. If someone could offer up some more serious proof, I'll believe you. But for now, I'd like to request that the number of years be withheld until it can be formally determined. ~Ken Levin, backbeatATgmail, 98-01
I remember Ringo saying her friend's neighbour's brother started it.
Even if it isn't as old as it's claimed to be, the Fruitopia is (allegedly) nasty enough to warrant its own mythology, no? --JW
Oh, it's definitely nasty enough. Just that there's no reason to exaggerate when it's already gross enough. -Dutchman
