Difference between revisions of "Talk:Canon"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Lancaster Lower Canon) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
JHU forgot itself. Baltimore site doesn't even have its own page. | JHU forgot itself. Baltimore site doesn't even have its own page. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Lancaster Lower Canon == | ||
| + | |||
| + | At least when I was at CTY back in the day, Sweet Transvestite was required on Second Saturday but it was not considered Canon; nor was it on the Canon CD. Should this be somehow placed in a category of its own? | ||
| + | --[[User:Sammka|Sammka]] 18:38, 21 August 2006 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 20:38, 21 August 2006
well, this is not the whole shebang, you forgot about John's Hopkins
JHU forgot itself. Baltimore site doesn't even have its own page.
Lancaster Lower Canon
At least when I was at CTY back in the day, Sweet Transvestite was required on Second Saturday but it was not considered Canon; nor was it on the Canon CD. Should this be somehow placed in a category of its own? --Sammka 18:38, 21 August 2006 (MST)
