Difference between revisions of "Global Politics: Human Rights and Justice"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (link) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{CTY Courses}} | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
− | |||
[[Global Politics: Human Rights and Justice]] is a [[Princeton|CTY Princeton]] course. | [[Global Politics: Human Rights and Justice]] is a [[Princeton|CTY Princeton]] course. | ||
==Course Description== | ==Course Description== | ||
− | + | :'''From the CTY course catalog:''' | |
This course examines the roles and responsibilities of nations and international organizations (governmental and non-governmental) in areas of human rights and justice. Focusing on recent cases ranging from Rwanda to Yugoslavia to China to Iraq, students ask questions including how much independence individual nations should have in defining human rights standards, when a nation’s economic stability should outweigh other global responsibilities, and how nations can heal themselves in the aftermath of atrocities. | This course examines the roles and responsibilities of nations and international organizations (governmental and non-governmental) in areas of human rights and justice. Focusing on recent cases ranging from Rwanda to Yugoslavia to China to Iraq, students ask questions including how much independence individual nations should have in defining human rights standards, when a nation’s economic stability should outweigh other global responsibilities, and how nations can heal themselves in the aftermath of atrocities. | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[Category:Princeton]] | [[Category:Princeton]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Courses]] |
Revision as of 19:50, 13 August 2009
This page is a stub article. It begs for completion. Help finish this page! Sign in and edit. |
Global Politics: Human Rights and Justice is a CTY Princeton course.
Course Description
- From the CTY course catalog:
This course examines the roles and responsibilities of nations and international organizations (governmental and non-governmental) in areas of human rights and justice. Focusing on recent cases ranging from Rwanda to Yugoslavia to China to Iraq, students ask questions including how much independence individual nations should have in defining human rights standards, when a nation’s economic stability should outweigh other global responsibilities, and how nations can heal themselves in the aftermath of atrocities.